#Mysql vs postgresql vs mariadb full#
#Mysql vs postgresql vs mariadb software#

PostgreSQL has advanced features such as materialized views and partial indexes which enhances performance. The ability to apply these patches in a short time frame is key.

#Mysql vs postgresql vs mariadb software#

It is imperative to keep open-source software up to date with the latest patches and releases. Similarly, the PostgreSQL Global Development Group (PGDG) publishes a list of active Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) which is addressed by a large and vibrant community. MariaDB has frequent security patches, which is an indication that the community addresses security very seriously. This means there are several options depending on your high availability requirements. PostgreSQL offers cascading replication, streaming replication, and synchronous replication. PostgreSQL only supports master-slave replication, while MariaDB supports both asynchronous master-slave and master-master replication. Both MariaDB and PostgreSQL focus on consistency and availability and can be deployed on multiple nodes. The replication strategies between PostgreSQL and MariaDB are notably different. PostgreSQL does scale well vertically, but it does not scale horizontally as well as MariaDB. MariaDB offers the ability to store less frequently accessed data in a separate partition which can speed up queries. MariaDB supports sharding via the Spider storage engine and Galera Cluster, while PostgreSQL does not offer horizontal partitioning of tables across multiple servers. PostgreSQL uses an internal cache and the server’s page cache for retrieving frequently accessed data, which helps it to perform better than MariaDB’s query cache. MariaDB is more suitable for smaller databases, and is also capable of storing data entirely in-memory - something not offered by PostgreSQL. PostgreSQL outperforms MariaDB in regard to reads and writes and is therefore more efficient.

MariaDB is a lighter database than PostgreSQL which allows a smaller memory footprint. MariaDB is more forgiving and autocorrects data types that do not match the schema being used for inserts and updates while PostgreSQL offers no such mechanism and is strictly typed. This enables both databases to store unstructured data typical with a NoSQL database. PostgreSQL supports the JSON and JSONB data types, whereas MariaDB offers a LONGTEXT column to offer similar functionality. Get detailed analysis of the top 15 open source database in use today with our Decision Makers Guide to Open Source Databases.

#Mysql vs postgresql vs mariadb full#

Read Our Full Guide to Open Source Databases Among RDBMS, PostgreSQL remains the 4th most popular, with MariaDB as the 8th most popular option. PostgreSQL is the more mature of the two offerings, is offered on more platforms, and includes additional APIs and access methods.įrom a popularity perspective, PostgreSQL is currently ranked as the 4th most popular database on, with MariaDB the 12th most popular. MariaDB is over a decade old and PostgreSQL is over 22 years old. Both are mature, open source relational database management servers (RDBMS). PostgreSQL, with sections that compare data types, performance, scalability, consistency, availability, security, and when to use one option over the other.Īt the surface, PostgreSQL and MariaDB are very similar databases. In this blog, we consider the pros and cons of MariaDB vs. Each offer their own advantages and disadvantages, so evaluating PostgreSQL vs. For companies searching for a new relational database management systems (RDBMS), established open source RDBMS like PostgreSQL and MariaDB will likely be at the top of the list.